Why should I make the game harder for myself when there's no reason to? Even if you have several weaker armies against doomstacks, the limit to the number of units mean that your reinforcements will rout very quickly as the initial army suffers casualities.Īlso, the people in this thread who support doomstacks haven't really adressed the OP, where VG presented a solution that does not hurt doomstacking at all, but still reworks the economy so having a larger number of weaker/balanced armies is not punished like it is currently.ĭoomstacks make the game easier but it is absolutely not needed to beat the AI. This is also enforced by the way reinforcements work as others have mentioned. with your own armies! With the heavy penalties on having too many armies, and the massive buffs the AI gets, it is difficult to beat the AI without doomstacks of your own to counter them. You have been corrected on that before.Ĭonsidering your past arguments and your constant proposal of hard caps, which would eliminate doomstacking until a very late-game if we would go by with what you usually proposed, your point here doesn't really hold up.ĭoomstacking AI matters for your own armies because you need to fight the AI.
My point has always been to make doomstacking the LEAST effective way of building armies, not the MOST effective one as it is now. Of course people don't agree about everything, but telling people to not even talk about potential changes is stupid. My point was that the "If you don't like the game don't play it" attitude is useless in a discussion about potential problems with the game. However, what you described was not really my point. My bad, I misread your answer, I thought you were referring to the first part of my answer. Because what is fun and what not as well as what would increase or decrease it is subjective. I just didn't find it necessary to comment on a "those changes would be better for the game and would raise the fun because I think so" statement. By that reasoning new DLC are meaningless, since although they make the game the better, the game is only for fun and if you don't enjoy it there is no need for change. In this thread people are suggesting changes that will make the game more fun, yet a lot of people seem opposed to it for no reason. It is fun, but it could certainly be more so.
Of course it's a game, and it's meant to be fun. I never said a lot? And also you missed my point completely.
0 kommentar(er)
